Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Category Archives: Search

47% of 18-24 year olds use real-time search results

Back at the end of 2009, Google announced that it would be integrating real time search results into search results pages. For a good demonstration of this, watch their real time search demonstration below…

Now, six months later, almost half (47%) of 18-24-year-olds use real-time search results. However, just 8% of these users find them useful (according to research by Tamar).

But what about other types of search results?

Interestingly, by looking into the search habits of 2,210 people, Tamar’s report also showed that just 4% of people would choose paid search results over natural search results, down by 1% on 2009 and down 6% on 2007.

The research found that people over 55 were the least likely to trust paid search as a trusted source with just 3% choosing it over natural search results.

Younger people are increasing their use of mobile to search as 14% of both 18-24-year olds and 25-34-year-olds use mobile search every day.

Neil Jackson, search strategy director at Tamar, said, “Consumers have decided that natural search is the route they trust more and this defines the strategic starting point for all brands, which need to focus on being highly visible ‘naturally’ through campaigns that reach effectively across a wide range of media and devices, especially mobile – a huge growth area for the search engines.”

How will Google’s ‘Mayday’ update affect you?

To find out about Google’s Mayday update, watch Matt Cutts talking about their latest algorithmic change…

Brand name bidding and the impact on luxury brands

Recently, a client of ours enquired over whether it was legal for a competitor of theirs to bid on their brand name in Google Adwords. Unfortunately, we had to tell them that, back 2008, Google opened up trademarked keywords to bidding in the UK (primarily to open up a potentially huge stream of revenue for itself).

Although this news is nothing new, the topic of brand name bidding re-emerged when, earlier this week, an article published in NMA stated that, according to a report sent to them by Marks & Clerk: “[out] of 266 UK marketers and business executives, 71% were “uncomfortable” with Google allowing brands to bid on rivals’ keywords, with 63% saying it’s unacceptable when a brand is protected by a trademark.” (NMA, Trademark bidding may be controversial, but is it common place? May 28th 2010).

However, the overall gist of NMA’s article was that although some brands are bidding on their competitors’ terms, it might not be happening as much as one might expect, and that additionally, it might not be as detrimental an effect on brands as was once expected. This was the conclusion arrived at after researchers at NMA looked at all the main department stores and supermarkets on the UK high street. They found that the only brand bidding on a rival term was House of Fraser on Debenhams.

So, never one to be out done, I conducted a little research of my own, but this time looking at smaller, more high end brands…

One of the first brand names I researched was ‘links of london’. The results were surprising. In the sponsored links, were a host of counterfeit websites with ‘links of london’ in the URL but with no use of the phrase in the ad text (Google will investigate ads which are using the brand keyword in the ad text). Some websites listed in these paid for links were so similar to the real thing, that it was quite hard to tell the official from the fake. Damaging? I think so – especially to luxury or high end brands. The same went for other luxury brands which returned sponsored links that the official brand might not be too happy about.

However, I would agree with NMA in that it is probably not happening as much as we all expected when Google first broke the news. In fact, during my search, I found few reputable, well known brands which had bid on other, similar sized, rival brands. In fact it tended to be poor quality, counterfeit or little known websites which had bid on bigger brand names (when the brand was not available to buy on the site in question – instead offering an alternative or fake product). That, or the listings were genuine stockists of the brand.

Therefore, in conclusion, although rival companies do not seem to be bidding on their competitors as much as expected, it is still damaging to a brand who does not want to see their product flogged on a discount or counterfeit site. Additionally, according to studies conducted back in 2009, the sectors most affected by the change was the travel and insurance sectors (ones which I did not research this time round).

So, what should a brand do?

Firstly, as demonstrated by Google vs. LVMH, there is little to be gained in taking legal action out against an online giant such as Google. Therefore, I would persist in arguing that brands need to remain focused on their organic search listings, and not focus solely other types of online brand building activities. Any brands’ strategy – large or small, should include organic SEO so that they appear at the top of Google’s organic search results.

Do not rely on paid listings to avoid good, old-fashioned search engine optimization – consumers still prefer organic listings over paid for links. Regardless of what’s going on in the paid section, ensure your site and brand shows up at the top of the natural, algorithmic section of the search. This alone will reinforce the relevance of your brand to the search term entered.

Happy birthday YouTube!

You may have noticed that I’ve been talking about video A LOT recently. Well,  if like me you’re fascinated by this explosion of video content and viewing on the web, you may be interested to know that: YouTube now generates more than 2 billion views a day (http://youtubeukblog.blogspot.com/) and that the average user spends, on average, 15 minutes per day on the site. It is also 5 years old this month (just like Graphic Alliance). So, happy birthday YouTube!

But remember that YouTube isn’t the only video online video community on the web. Although Google sites (YouTube is owned by Google) continue to dominate the space, they account for just under half of videos streamed during a month. According to comScore.com, the main growth drivers were sites such as BBC properties, Megavideo.com, and Facebook.com.

megavideo

The question remains…

After my post last month on mobile apps and mobile websites, two recent related news articles caught my eye. The first is the announcement, from the co-founder of Ocado, that their iPhone app has generated 4.4% of its total orders since February this year.

After being downloaded 107,000 times since it’s launch last July, its use has equated to £15m of revenue per year and, unsurprisingly, Ocado are looking to develop onto further digital platforms in the future.

Meanwhile, on the other hand, news has been received that What Car? has launched a mobile site, optimized for smartphones.

What Car launches mobile friendly website

According to New Media Age, this news comes as media agency MPG Media Contacts published research indicating that internet use in the home was shifting from PC to mobile. This was supported by a survey of 100 UK households which indicated that 21% of respondents aged between 18 and 65 said they prefer to browse the internet on their phones. These findings are also supported by Facebook who say that more than 100m of it’s users regularly access the site via their mobile phones.

So, the question really still does remain… mobile app or mobile website? Nevertheless I’m still standing firm, sticking to the idea that, in the long run (or if you can only afford one) a mobile site is the way to go…

How will Google’s new site speed factor affect you?

Last week Google announced that it will use page load speed to help rank pages in its results. Just so you know, site speed reflects how quickly a website responds to web requests. The decision was made in response to feedback from users who (unsurprisingly) said that they preferred sites which loaded quickly. So, now that page load speed has been added to Google’s list of over 200 ranking factors, what should you do?

Well, not a lot to be honest. As it turns out, fewer than 1% of search queries will be affected by this change and, if you were going to be affected, then you would have been already. Nevertheless, with all this talk about site speed and page load times, why not use a free tool to evaluate the speed of your website…

  • Page Speed – an open-source Firefox/Firebug Add-on. Webmasters and web developers can use Page Speed to evaluate the performance of their web pages and to get suggestions on how to improve them.
  • WebPagetest – allows you to provide the URL of a webpage to be tested. Provides a waterfall of your page load performance as well as a comparison against an optimization checklist.

And, on a final note, with the focus now firmly turning towards user experience (in that fast loading webpages = happy users) is the end of slow to load Flash websites on the horizon? Add this to the fact that plugin technology is on the way out (think of the devices that don’t support Flash – the old iPhone, iPad…) and it certainly is not looking good for Flash heavy sites. We’ll just have to wait and see…

Google Wave – flash in the pan?

A while ago, I wrote a post about Google Wave, and said that I would trial it for a while and then report back on how it was working for me. The time has now come to write that update, and to cut a long story short, Google Wave has entirely underwhelmed me. Whilst I’ve actively tried to use it, I go for days without even remembering to check my Wave inbox. Although on paper I understand that Google Wave offers greater communication prospects than email or existing social networks, I find it far easier to contact friends and colleagues through email, Facebook and Twitter. Furthermore, a lot of my communication is done via mobile (Blackberry), and as far as I know, there is no Google Wave Blackberry app, or simple way to sync the two (correct me if I am wrong). And, whilst Google Wave is still fledgling, I think that users should receive email notifications when their wave inbox is updated (my colleagues never remember to check their Wave inboxes either).

It seems that I’m not the only one losing interest in Google Wave. As the graph below shows,  Google did a great job of building up hype around Google Wave towards the end of last year, however it seems that interest in the product is now plummeting.

googletrendsgooglewaveThe graph above shows Google search volume for the term “Google Wave” over the past 12 months.

The Hitwise graph below further confirms that usage of the service is falling; traffic to the Google Wave has fallen considerably over the past two months.

sai-chart-google-wave

The above statistics don’t surprise me in the slightest; Google Wave is currently not sticky enough to hold attention, and the functionality isn’t great at the moment. No doubt Google have some tricks up their sleeves, and the product is still in beta, so I am by no means writing this service off, but for now, I’m going to stop waving.

What are your thoughts?

The implications of Google Real Time Search for brands

google real time search2

This is my second post in less than a week about Google.

I’m not obsessed I promise, but Google does seem to be rolling out a lot of new features recently (as well as spending a hell of a lot on advertising, no doubt taking advantage of cheap outdoor ad rates which it has helped to drive down).

Anyway, last week, following much anticipation, Google finally began rolling out ‘Google Real Time Search’. Real Time Search refers to the incorporation of ‘real time’ social media updates (from sites such as Twitter, Facebook and Friendfeed) in Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs). Of course, not all social media updates will be automatically incorporated in SERPs, but Facebook users will need to check/update their privacy settings to make sure their conversations are not being indexed by search engines.

So the question on everyone’s lips is – what will this mean for brands? If ever a brand was looking for a time to take social media seriously, surely this is it?

In a nutshell, yes. Whether you are a brand that commands one tweet a month, or one tweet a second, these real time updates will affect you. If you are part of a company which only gets tweeted about on rare occasions, each social media mention will act as a permanent fixture on the first page of Google until someone else decides to talk about you. And, if that mention has come from an irate customer, then I’m pretty sure that the ’someone else’ will be you!

Conversely, if you are a company which generates a lot of chatter online, then it will become important to ensure that overall sentiment is consistently positive. For example, for a global FMCG brand, one tweet will probably have a SERP-life of under a minute, giving individual tweets less impact. However, we all know how quickly things can escalate within social media, and 10 or 15 ‘retweets’ later, you may have a problem.

For trending news stories, I think that Real Time Search adds a new “emotional” element to online coverage. When searching for news about the BA strike, I was immediately confronted with tweets from real people who are being affected by the action.

BA strike

And then, there is the issue of spam. Take a look at the image at the top of this blog post. I got Graphic Alliance to feature on the first page of google results for the term “google real time search”, which is a very popular search term at the moment. Will people use trending topics to promote things entirely unrelated to that topic? Probably. I mean, it’s already happening on a massive scale within Twitter (Twitter displays trending topics, and a number of ‘twitterers’ incorporate these words in their tweets to gain visibility for something else).

As well as acknowledging the impact that Google Real Time Search has on your own online reputation, you should also think about ways to use Google Real Time Search to your advantage. Ensure that you are having regular conversations with your audiences online, and responding to valid customer queries quickly, even if it is just to say “we’ll get back to you shortly”. Constantly monitor what people are saying about you, your products, and your competitors. Don’t rely on Google alerts to tell you when people are talking about you – tweets will appear on Google search engine listings before you get your update, trust me, I just tried it! Use a faster monitoring system, like Tweetdeck, to see conversations as they happen.

I’m not saying that real time updates are the only important aspect of search engine results pages; in reality, they are ephemeral and I would rather have to deal with a negative tweet about me than a negative news article with a permalink. Also, a live feed is not available for every search term yet, just popular ones, although, Google have stated that Real Time Search will become ubiquitous very soon.

To conclude, what I think real time updates have done is ensure that social media cannot be ignored. But exactly how people take notice remains to be seen.

Ian, you’re fired! No, not by TfL, by the Internet…

TfL tube worker, Ian,  says an elderly passenger should be “slung under a train”

Another great example of how one man, one video recorder, and one internet connection can cause one huge problem. We keep saying it, but companies HAVE to monitor online conversations about themselves and react incredibly quickly, otherwise they might find themselves faced with a massive consumer backlash.

explosion graph

Take a look at the graph above. It depicts the amount of chatter about Transport for London (TfL) on Twitter, in the last 24 hours. Not much going on for the most part, and then suddenly, at around 8am this morning, something kicks off…

Yesterday, a humble blogger, Jonathan MacDonald, caught a shocking altercation between a TfL staff member and an elderly man on camera and blogged about it, later that evening.

12 hours later… the blog has over 100 comments, ‘TfL’ becomes a trending topic on Twitter, and the media have already caught wind of the story. It’s not even lunch time.

telegraph articletrending topic

No word from TfL, and at the moment, it seems that ‘Ian’ (the TfL employee who wanted an elderly passenger to be ’slung under a train’)  still has his job.

In my opinion, TfL MUST react now. I’m  not necessarily saying that Ian has to be sacked right this second; I’m sure there is a certain protocol that must be followed. But, they should make a statement, or publicly apologise to the elderly man who was abused by Ian.

I’m sure crisis talks are currently being held, hence the silence,  but their silence is being construed by the public as apathy. And apathy doesn’t win hearts and minds.

As I was writing the post, The Mayor of London did actually respond with:

@MayorOfLondon “Appalled by the video. Have asked TfL to investigate urgently. Abuse by passengers or staff is never acceptable.”

This tweet by the MoL is getting re-tweeted by a number of Londoners, who do seem slightly appeased by this response. More of this please!  Anyway, this story is very much live and kicking, so let’s see what happens.  I’ll just leave you with some of the latest “tweets” on this topic. For more, go to Twitter search, and type in “TFL or #TFL”. We’ll keep you updated… latest news is that the masses have found Ian’s Facebook page. Uh oh.

jimmynutmeg TfL guy wants passenger slung under a train. Pretty clear cut gross misconduct. Hope you get sacked Ian! http://tinyurl.com/yfpfy5a

uponnothing RT @richpayne88: Urge people to submit a complaint on the TFL website. I did. Under distinguishing features, ‘obnoxious personailty’

micksterling http://bit.ly/1RFNNx – finally evidence that #tfl staff are indeed the rudest in the world!! I hope this guy does indeed get sacked…

tomazstolfa Fascinating how Londoners are spreading the word about this TFL staff incident – http://bit.ly/V8Pju >> http://bit.ly/42afVJ

adaminlondon RT @DJ_Alexander: Be careful when using the London Underground; there’s a risk of being slung under a train by #tfl http://bit.ly/3l3Nn3

macfras It’ll be interesting to see what happens to the Tfl worker. I don’t especially want him sacked but at least needs a severe warning.

CaptainJCook I really hope TFL do something about this.No matter what the guy did(or not) b4 the vid started, there is no excuse to treat people that way

andybeeching @steveworkman, @nortools Looks like the mayor is onto that TFL video: http://tinyurl.com/yhzlds6

BrotherMagneto This appears to be #tfl Ian’s FB page, and he’s – a JEDI!! (Linked to Facebook page, which we aren’t going to do!)

alexparish Loving TFL Ian’s Facebook profile “I’m often mistaken for unfriendly because i tend to be quiet..” hmm http://bit.ly/2LtmVK

kuatofkuat Ian from TFL has a Facebook profile, and it’s fully open to anyone in the London network… that’s all I’m saying!

Spol How many people can we get to poke Ian on Facebook #tfl

Voneron @SteveJP LOL “About me: Easy going guy, happy in most circles.” Err, really?? tfl

Go black to be green!

Did you know that a monitor requires more power to display a white (or light) screen than a black (or dark) screen?

O.k. so the savings aren’t huge (an all white web page uses about 74 watts to display and an all back page only 59) but apply this to Google, which gets at least 200 million queries per day, and the numbers start to become slightly more significant (see the blog post “Black Google Would Save 750 Megawatt Hours a Year”).

So, what can you do to help? Well, why not try using uk.blackle.com, a search engine powered by Google. By setting it as your homepage, every time you load your internet browser a little bit of energy will be saved!

“Blackle.com – saving energy one search at a time”

Graphic Alliance